44) non dramatic (but) voting

To reduce the effect of small/special interest group of voters being more organized then the general public, while performing in their high turnout and in lowering the general turnout, and so to better reflect the long will of the general voters and to reduce the dramatic and random argumentation in such voting, we can:

  • 1. Increase the participation time between the proposal and the conclusion date, being just before turning all announcements to votes, which is done just after counting all the announcements.
  • 2. Allow in participation time:
    • 2.1. each voter to announce or change her/his announcement;
    • 2.2. the statistic of the announcements be published and available to all voters.
  • 3. Fix, in the proposal, together with its conclusion date some additional limit conditions for the public's validation, such that when each limit is not reached, then the vote is cancelled, limits such as
    • 3.1. limit of tolerance, being number of changes of announcement per voter and limit of the max ratio of such tolerance in the general vote,
    • 3.2. a minimum turnout per general vote,

By pilepile, on 02 May 2017 13:04 history Tags:


~~Page's End!~~ Ignore ads by installing adblockplus.

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License