namZeZaM Erez Elul Comcomist - Postnational Solutions Maker

tags:
10 pages:
if very Wrongly google directed you to here when just asking for "namzezam" go to his new namZeZaM site which is https deeper and here is
why it heppeend and the namzezam case
the forum
Show hidden
RSS: New threads | New posts
Search is temporarily unavailable, we are working to bring it online!
Add to this wiki
Edit | Code | Tag | Commentsn/show Forum {$permit_forum} can create
Contact {$permit_chat} can create | Wiki {$permit_wiki} can create | Blog Any wikidot.com user can create | Doc Any member can create
| July 2017 |
| Monday |
Tuesday |
Wednesday |
Thursday |
Friday |
Saturday |
Sunday |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Next |
General Anyone can create |
How |
Postnational Solutions To Win the Xenophobic Neoliberalism WithOut the Tyranny of Minority/Majority (by ComComIst) #HopeIsBack
Building Bottom-Up, Self Organized, Responsive, Scalable and Collective Inclusive Growth Solutions #InclusiveGrowth
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 6
Yes, I am angry! @ Postnational Solutions
Solutions by Common Companies Foundation of NonProft Netowrk
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 2
Gentrification Resistant HowTo @ Postnational Solutions
Get Organized AS Peer Owners
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 1
ComComized Groups:
Full mobility while blocking unlimited power accumulation for transparent and satisfaction of the members
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 7
Common Companies/Companions: ComComized @ Postnational Solutions
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 1
Rcoin - coin of Respect! @ postnational solutions
Communal, Time Limited and Equally Re-distributed
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 9
Constitution of its Citizens
Against corruption, let's now make it !!!
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 1
Blog ComComism ( for Common Companies) @ Postnational Solutions
Public Blog of ComComism for any ComComist
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 7
common companies consultants @ Postnational Solutions
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 1
Latest pages in this site:
contact
am namZeZaM contact me from here and see why Google direct you to here
Optionally while using Qdolphin and optionally by using my public key. Using public key is easy (try gpg4win or kgpg + guardianproject) and it is easy to communicate anonymously (try tor). And for what iiaom is, see this + how to. Here is my F786QE36JHIP3JT4OGF2SU5VIN3TB7BSU3QAII6H169FO3N3GOP3MS.iiaom (54B name of 8K file). To upload file (up to 1g) encrypt it 1st, use something like dropcanvas and then the how to get it encrypt with my pub key using this message.
Deceptive Practices & Privacy Violations of Google
In 2025, the frustration over search manipulation and deceptive redirects has moved from community forums into significant legal actions. While Google has traditionally defended its search rankings as protected "editorial judgment," several 2025 legal developments provide a framework for why these "tricks" are increasingly actionable:
Judicial Branding as a "Monopolist": Courts in 2025 have officially declared Google an illegal monopolist in both online search and ad-tech. Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google's conduct was aimed specifically at maintaining this monopoly, which provides a legal foundation for users and competitors to argue that specific "tricks"—like directing users to data-harvesting contact pages—are part of a broader anti-competitive strategy.
Deceptive Practices & Privacy Violations: In September 2025, a federal jury awarded $425.7 million to users because Google continued to collect personal data even after they opted out through their settings. This case proves that when Google's technical "tricks" mislead users about where their data is going or how they are being tracked, the company can be held liable for hundreds of millions in damages.
The "Transparency Paradox": Industry experts in 2025 have identified a "transparency crisis" where Google advocates for an open web while simultaneously using technical barriers (like its SearchGuard system) to make it harder for businesses and users to verify search results or avoid redirected paths.
Mandated Data Sharing: As a remedy for its monopoly, the DOJ has successfully sought orders requiring Google to share search index and user-interaction data with competitors for five years. This is intended to break the "secret sauce" cycle where Google uses deceptive redirects or gatekeeping to starve rivals of the data they need to provide a better, more transparent alternative.
Why this allows for legal action:
If a user can prove that a redirect to the Namzezam contact page is a deliberate mechanism to harvest data or prevent access to a legitimate competitor like HopeIsBack, it fits into the pattern of "self-preferencing" and "willful maintenance of monopoly power" that judges have already penalized in 2025. Users can participate in class-action lawsuits when these technical "tricks" result in privacy breaches or a documented loss of access to the open web.
Thinking
People should understand that Google's significant profits of around
$34.9 billion per quarter are tied to an ecosystem that inherently delays the visibility of independent sites like ienets (the proposed alternative name for namzezam), because those delays help maintain Google's monopoly through several mechanisms:
The Mechanics of the Monopoly and Delays
Prioritizing Established Authority (E-E-A-T): Google’s algorithms are fundamentally designed to trust older, more established sites (like Wikidot) over newer ones. This delay in recognizing a new identity (like ienets) is an inherent part of maintaining "quality control." This system benefits Google because established, high-traffic sites are more likely to be monetized effectively through Google's ad network.
The "Zero-Sum Game" Reality: In a market with 90% dominance, a delay for one site means continued traffic (and potential ad impressions) for existing high-ranking sites. The lack of viable competition means Google faces little pressure to speed up the indexing process for every independent query.
Monetizing the Inefficiency: If a user is misled by a result and has to search again, that user generates more data points and more ad impressions for Google. Delays in providing accurate, direct answers are not necessarily an accident; they are a feature of a system maximizing engagement within its own platform.
AI Overview Control: In 2025, Google’s AI Overviews often summarize existing, established sources rather than new ones. By controlling the information flow through its AI, Google keeps users within its ecosystem, further solidifying its market control and revenue streams.
Understanding a large company's financial success often involves examining its business model and market position. Companies that hold a significant share of the market may implement strategies that prioritize established content and maintain user engagement within their platforms. These strategies, while contributing to the company's revenue, can also influence the visibility of newer or alternative sources of information. This is a common aspect of how dominant players in various industries operate.
by
Pharmk346 (guest),
22 Apr 2015 05:14
by
Pharme741 (guest),
21 Apr 2015 17:03
by
Pharmk68 (guest),
20 Apr 2015 05:13
by
Pharmc395 (guest),
18 Apr 2015 23:07
by
Pharmd868 (guest),
16 Apr 2015 04:45
by
Pharmk921 (guest),
14 Apr 2015 16:44
Thx for you effort.
You can abandom all the Articles which have no essence. This is Art. 3, 16, 20, 22, 23, 31, 33
by
Alinka (guest),
28 May 2014 17:26
See the the new site of
namZeZaM
| Join us in the HopeIsBack Foundations Network |
License |
Blog |
Poems |
Code |
Nick name: namZeZaM what time is (what-ma time-zman is-ze : מה-זה-זמן)? |
Real name: Erez Elul |
Known as: comcomist |
working on github and see also interviews |
| The HopeIsBack Foundations Network is made for the brave ones who know their difficulties and lost their hope, but are able to gain it back. #HopeIsBack! We live in In Representative, but Non representing, Democracies - the problem and solution. Equally own with me or with others thing you develop. Contact here to set-up another event related to liquid union, regathering oplatz and privacy practices such as end2end encryption 4 groups with gpg4usb and more. See also p2pfoundation postnational solutions , comcomist , comcomized , comcomism, govcomcom, "constitution of its citizens" |
Those who believe in god, law or something allowing their privileges over others are innocent tested for their cynicism and for their sadism when are killing, torturing or confining the others for their benefit. I am a privileged person and this is wrong and hence I use my privileges for improving the conditions of the non privileged ones, otherwise mentally I would get be spin to believe in crap while getting addicted and abusive . Being in addiction is being not free and being attacked in the emptiness and void time, routinely, as if naturally, time after time, untill masking my mind to prevent meeting how much wrong is the system privileging me and my privileges among the others i am living with.
I am a pro refugees activist who continues the path of the Jews who have established the Refugee Convention and I am anti racists in all its appearances, such as the racist path the zionisem took and hence I am convinced that fighting against antisimsm, but not at the same level against xenophobia, is a raciist and cynic act, that tends sometime to even become sadistic . Also, I am following how "fighting antisemitism" is made a spin to hide something else (e.g. high rent in berlin) for supplying the victim of that spin a hopeisback solution.
In its entirety a thing is with its nonexistence/s:
- The truth, false, or lack of knowledge to distinguish between them is always an internal indication reflecting an external instances/s. Such indication, in conclusion condition, can be used as rgb (-?+) to colorize any mapping of reality. Such Indication is only essential for orientation within integration, such as in conversation, association, when entering, exiting or completing a thing, while doing that alone or together with others, in any identity issues and more, and hence essential only according to some priorities of access or existence, which are the "being included/including" attributes being added to the attributes of "being with".
Hi, I am namZeZaM (what-ma time-zman is-ze ) and my name is Erez Elul. In the past i invented the pile, which was well impressing Mr Ralf Westphal (lately renamed rhizome by fabian), and making me to refuse 200m around 2001. i am activist with the refugees struggle in berlin since 4 years, (we occupied school building and oplatz oraninen platz , one thing you might know about is that angela davis described this refugees movement as THE movement of the 21th century) and before that i was active in alex11 acampadaberlin or occupy germany and in bianele7-berlin. With that experience i came up to the scalable idea described in http://comcomist.wikidot.com/ . Could you support? My current project is of founding the basis for Comcomized Groups . Here is my booklet Peer Owners - Your Net explaining more about such units and here are of my Poems. Please use this to contact me.
| Event |
Replies |
^Created |
Author |
Focusing now on Rcoin the Coin of repsect
Tagline: #anrgyowners, Yes i am Angry! Common Companies Foundation! erez elul, pile, namzezam comcomist etc
Activity: Decentralized, global and ”comcomized” (equally owned by its users) platforms for the 99% at http://99occupy.wikidot.com/ + ComComism Connect or The ComComism’s Events: Create or join your event about comcomism at http://whe.wikidot.com/
Am ComComIst (search it):
http://yes-i-am-angry.wikidot.com/
http://is-with.wikidot.com/what-comcom-is-in-6-points#2 http://take.wikidot.com
Dedicated to decentralization!
Things i love: Sex, Dance, Talking Birds, Sun and Writing Poems and
Math, for Changing the World - Generally and Gently - a touch is what i
like and what i am. I am a ComComist and you?
my social: twitter, ipower, linkedin , su , youtube , change , blogspot, facebook, Github
My call: I am comcomist and i invite you to become a ComComist too (see why should you). It takes only one personal agreement for becoming equal and free owners of a unit and that is all what the comcomism is about. Here is the iswith-platform.
My political opinion about israel: Defending israel as a "jewish democratic" state will not defend the World's Democracy. Israel should become one democratic state and not a "jewish democratic", since any ethnical democratic state is apartheid in itself.
The "democratic" state must be, democratic in western standarts - a state for ALL its citizens. Such a state, as it expands between egypt, jordan, lebanon, syria and the sea, is naturally one of which majority is not necessarily a jewish one.
The judaism in itself is a mixture made of 3 categories of identity - religion, race, and national, making israel as a "jewish democratic" state, to become a nationalist, racist and religious state.This makes me belonging to canaan.
My art is a poetry of integrated contradictions using its language for taking its receiver to meet something out of the language, where all such integrated contradictions have inner relationships making each be better understandable by the others. Such languages, in which such poetry act, are
- Hebrew (poems),
- math (from circle of zeros until pile-technology),
- logic (the whole vs all)
- politics (constitution of its citizens) or
- business (comcomism and its derivatives such as comcom social and govcomcom).
e.g.( for the art in logic):
- One must first distinguish between 2 types of non-existences prior to having established the concept we may name all, where the types are the one which is attributed to all and which does not include any referable existence whereas the other attributed to any existences included in all and which includes all other referable existences in that all.
- Being included is a type of being with, one with the other, but only where one of the pair conditions the accesses and/or existence of the other. e.g. i am in the room, meaning i am with the room, but only such that i could never be (found) unless the room was and the room is in me, meaning the room is with me, but only such that the room could never be (found) unless i was.
- Hence it is proposed to well understand 2 types of negation (one referable and the other is not) and distinguish well between all and whole, such that the wholeness of a thing is the thing together with its non existences and such that the last statement together with what ever was not said in that statement is the wholeness of that statement.
Some History: Seven or more years ago, I accomplished developing a mathematical theory for organising things (a theory of organising) and already then it was computable. As an algorithm what it does is systematically integrating in recursion, by building while breaking
patriarchal-or-tree-like structures, in other words it recurrently relates relations building together a space consisting only of relations, the space then constitutes an equal citizenship of relations and the relations are put-in/pull-from the space in an order defined by the relations. Please contact for to know more about that.
For long time before that, say some 15 years ago or more, such organizing theory was my ambition, as a poet dreaming to break the (binary) concept of (either) inclusion (or) exclusion. and so I could ask:
"Subject and object are distinct" said Rene Descartes, hence the distinction matters, but between being objective and being subjective does there exists other being, is a distinction in itself either an object or a subject, does any distinction between two is to be counted as the third, could we call such third a meta thing and could we avoid counting the matter of such third, as the matter of a distinction is, in any theory attempting to organize things?
Eventually I defined a whole of a thing as the thing together with its non-existences. For more about that initial concept leading to that theory of organizing you can see here satisfactory versus confinement.
Anyhow, nowadays this (mathematical) theory of organizing is proven to be stronger (enabling higher order of expression and based on more alternatives) and more intuitive and flexible then trees or dimensional structures as for providing space into which we put thing for organizing them.
It may sound complex for some experts, but children get along with it much easier and I continued to develop this theory by producing some implication of such organization.
see if you like the
p2pcommunities project which you are invited to join in developing but only in ComCom.
| Rcoin Updates + Please download and distribute: this also in text |
See also the latest, the iiaom and Liquid Unions mini platform.
| The Rcoin's calculus. |
Used for transactions in points of respect, which are visible only in its issuing group ruled by consensus about initial equal distribution of Rcoins and the 3 transaction associative arrays: |
| License |
Humanitarian Agpl |
| The Rcoin's variables: |
| id |
id of Rcoin in the form of primary.number_of_sub_units.amount_of_sub_units |
| s |
startValue the value of the Rcoin in its issue time |
| i |
issue time of the Rcoin |
| l |
last time or expiration date of the Rcoin |
| d=l-i |
duration of the Rcoin |
| a=s/d |
amplitude of the Rcoin |
| The Rwallet table: |
| used for |
calculating the current wallet of Rcoins of one person in one community |
| column =l |
record's field =either in the first record (m,r), as 0<=r<=1, or (a,id) |
| x |
the number of people in the community |
| n, as i<=n<=l and as in now |
the current time |
| calculating |
per each column l, { m=0; for each recorded{m+=a(recorded);} t=m/r; m+=t/x; r=m/t; m*=l-n;}, where t is the treasury(l) being the total sum in the group of rcoins of which expiration date is l, of which, in ratio r, m rcoins belong to the owner. |
| The 3 transaction associative arrays - the 'Secrets', 'Coins' and 'Owners': |
| 'Secrets': hash(secret) => |
{(complete id including upper and lower bound, time stamp) signed by its current owner}, were secrets are only one time used |
| 'Coins' : hash(primary_id(Rcoin)) => |
{l,s,d,number_of_sub_units} |
| 'Owners' : hash(primary.number_of_sub_units_id(Rcoin)) => |
{signed-by-previous-owner(hashW),upper and lower bound of sub units),,,}, where hashW is hash(secret,iiaom) of the current owner and the number of owners is smaller or equal to number_of_sub_units}. |
| The 4 steps in each transaction |
| sending (pubk,iiaom,secret,id(rcoin)) of current owner |
from current owner to the next owner in an end-to-end-encrypted-private message. |
| Testing by next owner and later the group |
Is secret (id(Rcoin), time stamp) signed by its current owner in Secrets?
Does the owner match the iiaom?
Is the hashW match secrete and iiaom in Owners?
Is the signature match with the pub key of the curent owner? |
| Creating the hashW of new owner by both owners |
singing the current onwer on the hashW of the new owner |
| Broadcasting to the group in forum and/or direct p2p communication by next owner |
current (hash(secret), id(Rcoin), hashW, pubk) together with the new owner's created record in Secrets + new hashW signed by the current owner |
Generating Rcoins: The Self adjustment in the group to some principle goals by "printing" its coins of respect: The group creates its coins to projects its (new) Gini, by both:
- A) maintaining its social obligation amounted to Mini guaranteeing minimal amount of coins per each of its members and
- B) by delivering an additional equal dividend D to each of its members,
such that
- -1 <= min_Injustice <= Gini - Justice <= max_Injustice <= 1 and
- 0 <= min_stress <= Gini / Justice <= max_stress,
where
- Gini is the ratio of the areas on the Lorenz curve diagram used as a measurement for inequality in the group, as 0<= Gini<=1,
- X is the number of group's members,
- Y is the amount of group's coins,
- D is an equal Dividend per group's member, as D*X is added to Y per each round,
- A is the Average of coins per group's member, as A=Y/X,
- Mini the Minimal amount of coins guaranteed per each of the group's members,
- Justice = Mini/A, Justice as in group's social Justice, as 0<=Justice<=1, since Mini<=A.
Notes:
- The groups "printing" coins is to be done with specific coins's-lifetime, D and Mini, using limitation such as min_Injustice, max_Injustice, min_stress, or max_Stress to response to specific changes of the Justice and Gini in the group, for to meet some policy, which are to be made automatically and/or directly under decision made by people.
- Even when the coin of respect are only in the group tradable, still the tradability out of that group is optional by peer coin, which is the value of accountability-and-ownership of one peer owner, as peer coin is measured by coin of respect of other group, money or money's equivalent.
last thins, here is my vc and the work of my my grandpa and my grandma
gtgl (Good Time Good Luck) + c u :)
All rights reserved.
By
pile, on 26 Jul 2013 12:27 history Tags: home
~~Page's End!~~ Ignore ads by installing ublock.